Then why is it that every time I post something from one of your credible scientific organizations that contradicts your propaganda, you don't respond? Without exception.
In a recent example, you made up the statistic that global warming is causing precipitation to decline. You even repeated it. So I replied with links/quotes from multiple credible scientific organizations with statistics indicating the complete opposite from your non scientific noncredible invented stats. I asked if they are still credible, or if they have been struck from the ever shrinking list because they don't support the agenda?
And you refused to acknowledge.
Do you think that behaviour encourages your opposition to respond?
In a recent example, you made up the statistic that global warming is causing precipitation to decline. You even repeated it. So I replied with links/quotes from multiple credible scientific organizations with statistics indicating the complete opposite from your non scientific noncredible invented stats. I asked if they are still credible, or if they have been struck from the ever shrinking list because they don't support the agenda?
And you refused to acknowledge.
Do you think that behaviour encourages your opposition to respond?
Comment