April 1

[chuckChuck]

Thanks to the mild winter, I did not have to plow snow at the remote bin today in order to load some wheat for the cleaner. I would save energy by making milder winters a permanent thing. Block chuck and remove the silly from agri-ville. There is an open survey at environment canuckistan regarding net zero targets. It does have area where you can try to explain to the stupid that CO2 is not a pollutant and that canuckistan needs to undue the damaging green scams now.

Yeah and if you are unlucky you will save money in a hot dry summer when you don't have have to spend as much to harvest your poor crop!

So you are cheering on a permanent el nino? C'mon man wake up. Warming oceans will make your winters milder and your summers dryer and hotter. Is that what you really want?

[fjlip]

Answer here then ,CC....

How would a COOLING planet help/save/benefit all life?
Give examples. Like less crops/food/more heating required?

Tell us WHAT is the IDEAL C02, IDEAL climate? when was that??

[sumdumguy]

administrator - PLEASE BLOCK CHUCK!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

How about before we block Chuck, give him a chance to redeem himself and actually respond to a question.

I asked a few times already, but perhaps he was busy and somehow overlooked them.

As of today, what options does a Canadian trucker have to lower his or her emissions?
BC is far ahead of the rest of us, having 16 years of CO2 tax to incentivize them, what changes have BC truckers made in that time?

[agstar77]

administrator - PLEASE BLOCK CHUCK!

If you leave too. Why are you so obsessed with Chuck? Just present facts and everyone can judge who is worth listening too.

[sumdumguy]

You should be gone too.

[blackpowder]

Chuck as an individual poster is unique. There is no one poster on here I would agree with 100% of the time. Nor would I choose to listen to them everyday.
Critical thinking is exercised most of the time. Often Chuck is a very fast skim. But his posts aren't the only ones passed over. Merely the most abrasive if you let them. Certainly the most laborious.
One can always find more productive, less irritating things to bide the time.
Don't step in the dog shit on purpose then bitch about the smell

[agstar77]

Interesting that the ones complaining about free speech and plots to silence them are the first to deny others of speech.

[WiltonRanch]

Interesting that the ones complaining about free speech and plots to silence them are the first to deny others of speech.

Right on. It’s a two way street for sure. We may not agree but can be civil and discuss things. It’s a problem though when the intention is to cause a disturbance and only respond to weak arguments and intentionally not respond to difficult questions except name calling and vitriolic rhetoric, or just plain ignore the conversation and post whatever nonsense akin to a bot. I don’t agree with punting anyone for opposing views but troublemakers are a different story.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I just realized that Chuck never did respond to my question about how British Columbia truckers have adapted to the 16 years of carbon tax.
Avoiding an easy question like that is out of character for someone as reliable as chuck. I'm sure it can't be because the answer is inconvenient. It is probably because he is still busy counting all of the zero emissions trucks on BC roads.
Just bumping the question up again so that no one can accuse Chuck of deflecting or avoiding the uncomfortable questions.

[TOM4CWB]

The tax allows individuals and corporations to decide how best to increase efficiency and reduce emissions. It's more of market based approach, less intrusive and lower in cost than regulations which also have costs. It's one tool in the basket. Both Alberta and Saskatchewan have their own large emitters carbon tax plan. But they never mention it because of politics. They would rather follow little pp's bogus claim that the carbon tax is the only cause of inflation. And they could have designed their own consumer carbon tax system and done what they wanted. Instead they want to blame Ottawa for political gain!

You forgot CC… CO2 emissions have absolutely nothing to do with Climate Warming. Facts are increasing C02 increases the ability of plants on planet earth… to fix nitrogen more efficiently and sequencing more carbon into the soil while being significantly more productive and water efficient.

Just because you say And Believe your deception… does not make it true CC…

Easter Blessings!
King Jesus is Risen Indeed!!!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You forgot CC… CO2 emissions have absolutely nothing to do with Climate Warming.

That is not entirely true. CO2 definitely is a greenhouse gas and at much lower concentrations, increasing CO2 does increase the greenhouse effect. But at 400 parts per million, the wavelengths it functions on are completely saturated and it has almost no further effect to increase it beyond the current concentrations.
Increasing CO2 from here on out will definitely contribute to greening the Earth and increasing crop yields, but unfortunately will not contribute to beneficially warming the Earth any further.