• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

April 1

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #41
    Originally posted by sumdumguy View Post
    administrator - PLEASE BLOCK CHUCK!
    If you leave too. Why are you so obsessed with Chuck? Just present facts and everyone can judge who is worth listening too.

    Comment


      #42
      You should be gone too.

      Comment


        #43
        Chuck as an individual poster is unique. There is no one poster on here I would agree with 100% of the time. Nor would I choose to listen to them everyday.
        Critical thinking is exercised most of the time. Often Chuck is a very fast skim. But his posts aren't the only ones passed over. Merely the most abrasive if you let them. Certainly the most laborious.
        One can always find more productive, less irritating things to bide the time.
        Don't step in the dog shit on purpose then bitch about the smell
        ​​​​

        Comment


          #44
          Interesting that the ones complaining about free speech and plots to silence them are the first to deny others of speech.

          Comment


            #45
            Originally posted by agstar77 View Post
            Interesting that the ones complaining about free speech and plots to silence them are the first to deny others of speech.
            Right on. It’s a two way street for sure. We may not agree but can be civil and discuss things. It’s a problem though when the intention is to cause a disturbance and only respond to weak arguments and intentionally not respond to difficult questions except name calling and vitriolic rhetoric, or just plain ignore the conversation and post whatever nonsense akin to a bot. I don’t agree with punting anyone for opposing views but troublemakers are a different story.

            Comment


              #46
              I just realized that Chuck never did respond to my question about how British Columbia truckers have adapted to the 16 years of carbon tax.
              Avoiding an easy question like that is out of character for someone as reliable as chuck. I'm sure it can't be because the answer is inconvenient. It is probably because he is still busy counting all of the zero emissions trucks on BC roads.
              Just bumping the question up again so that no one can accuse Chuck of deflecting or avoiding the uncomfortable questions.

              Comment


                #47
                Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post

                The tax allows individuals and corporations to decide how best to increase efficiency and reduce emissions. It's more of market based approach, less intrusive and lower in cost than regulations which also have costs. It's one tool in the basket. Both Alberta and Saskatchewan have their own large emitters carbon tax plan. But they never mention it because of politics. They would rather follow little pp's bogus claim that the carbon tax is the only cause of inflation. And they could have designed their own consumer carbon tax system and done what they wanted. Instead they want to blame Ottawa for political gain!
                You forgot CC… CO2 emissions have absolutely nothing to do with Climate Warming. Facts are increasing C02 increases the ability of plants on planet earth… to fix nitrogen more efficiently and sequencing more carbon into the soil while being significantly more productive and water efficient.

                Just because you say And Believe your deception… does not make it true CC…

                Easter Blessings!
                King Jesus is Risen Indeed!!!

                Comment


                  #48
                  Originally posted by TOM4CWB View Post

                  You forgot CC… CO2 emissions have absolutely nothing to do with Climate Warming.
                  That is not entirely true. CO2 definitely is a greenhouse gas and at much lower concentrations, increasing CO2 does increase the greenhouse effect. But at 400 parts per million, the wavelengths it functions on are completely saturated and it has almost no further effect to increase it beyond the current concentrations.
                  Increasing CO2 from here on out will definitely contribute to greening the Earth and increasing crop yields, but unfortunately will not contribute to beneficially warming the Earth any further.

                  Comment


                    #49
                    Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post

                    That is not entirely true. CO2 definitely is a greenhouse gas and at much lower concentrations, increasing CO2 does increase the greenhouse effect. But at 400 parts per million, the wavelengths it functions on are completely saturated and it has almost no further effect to increase it beyond the current concentrations.
                    Increasing CO2 from here on out will definitely contribute to greening the Earth and increasing crop yields, but unfortunately will not contribute to beneficially warming the Earth any further.
                    Water Vapour is by far the most efficient greenhouse gas… to warm our planet.

                    Stopping all high altitude aircraft flying… would decrease our atmospheric temperatures.

                    Easter Blessings!

                    Comment


                      #50
                      "Water Vapour is by far the most efficient greenhouse gas… to warm our planet."

                      What are libtards/CC going to do about the earth KILLING clouds/moisture?

                      Better READ again Climatards...https://co2coalition.org/facts/

                      Comment

                      • Reply to this Thread
                      • Return to Topic List
                      Working...