April 1

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I just realized that Chuck never did respond to my question about how British Columbia truckers have adapted to the 16 years of carbon tax.
Avoiding an easy question like that is out of character for someone as reliable as chuck. I'm sure it can't be because the answer is inconvenient. It is probably because he is still busy counting all of the zero emissions trucks on BC roads.
Just bumping the question up again so that no one can accuse Chuck of deflecting or avoiding the uncomfortable questions.

[TOM4CWB]

The tax allows individuals and corporations to decide how best to increase efficiency and reduce emissions. It's more of market based approach, less intrusive and lower in cost than regulations which also have costs. It's one tool in the basket. Both Alberta and Saskatchewan have their own large emitters carbon tax plan. But they never mention it because of politics. They would rather follow little pp's bogus claim that the carbon tax is the only cause of inflation. And they could have designed their own consumer carbon tax system and done what they wanted. Instead they want to blame Ottawa for political gain!

You forgot CC… CO2 emissions have absolutely nothing to do with Climate Warming. Facts are increasing C02 increases the ability of plants on planet earth… to fix nitrogen more efficiently and sequencing more carbon into the soil while being significantly more productive and water efficient.

Just because you say And Believe your deception… does not make it true CC…

Easter Blessings!
King Jesus is Risen Indeed!!!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You forgot CC… CO2 emissions have absolutely nothing to do with Climate Warming.

That is not entirely true. CO2 definitely is a greenhouse gas and at much lower concentrations, increasing CO2 does increase the greenhouse effect. But at 400 parts per million, the wavelengths it functions on are completely saturated and it has almost no further effect to increase it beyond the current concentrations.
Increasing CO2 from here on out will definitely contribute to greening the Earth and increasing crop yields, but unfortunately will not contribute to beneficially warming the Earth any further.

[TOM4CWB]

That is not entirely true. CO2 definitely is a greenhouse gas and at much lower concentrations, increasing CO2 does increase the greenhouse effect. But at 400 parts per million, the wavelengths it functions on are completely saturated and it has almost no further effect to increase it beyond the current concentrations.
Increasing CO2 from here on out will definitely contribute to greening the Earth and increasing crop yields, but unfortunately will not contribute to beneficially warming the Earth any further.

Water Vapour is by far the most efficient greenhouse gas… to warm our planet.

Stopping all high altitude aircraft flying… would decrease our atmospheric temperatures.

Easter Blessings!

[fjlip]

"Water Vapour is by far the most efficient greenhouse gas… to warm our planet."

What are libtards/CC going to do about the earth KILLING clouds/moisture?

Better READ again Climatards...https://co2coalition.org/facts/

[chuckChuck]

You guys are wrong about water vapour. Again you don't understand the science.

Water vapour does not cause the original warming. It amplifys warming because it is a positive feed back loop!

[url]https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/steamy-relationships-how-atmospheric-water-vapor-amplifies-earths-greenhouse-effect/[/url]

Some people mistakenly believe water vapor is the main driver of Earth’s current warming. But increased water vapor doesn’t cause global warming. Instead, it’s a consequence of it. Increased water vapor in the atmosphere amplifies the warming caused by other greenhouse gases.

Earth's water cycle.

NASA It works like this: As greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane increase, Earth’s temperature rises in response. This increases evaporation from both water and land areas. Because warmer air holds more moisture, its concentration of water vapor increases. Specifically, this happens because water vapor does not condense and precipitate out of the atmosphere as easily at higher temperatures. The water vapor then absorbs heat radiated from Earth and prevents it from escaping out to space. This further warms the atmosphere, resulting in even more water vapor in the atmosphere. This is what scientists call a "positive feedback loop." Scientists estimate this effect more than doubles the warming that would happen due to increasing carbon dioxide alone.

[shtferbrains]

The taxpayers are done with it Chuck.
They are sick of paying more and more taxes leaving little for them to live what was considered a normal life.
The carbon tax is the lightning rod.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You guys are wrong about water vapour. Again you don't understand the science.

...

Some people mistakenly believe water vapor is the main driver of Earth’s current warming. But increased water vapor doesn’t cause global warming. Instead, it’s a consequence of it. Increased water vapor in the atmosphere amplifies the warming caused by other greenhouse gases.

Do you not read any of the responses on here? Or are you just utterly unable to comprehend them?

A couple of weeks ago, in response to you posting this exact topic, I posted an article from NOAA indicating that the exact opposite is happening.
Actual measured atmospheric water vapour is decreasing, while the models claim it should be increasing.

[fjlip]

96% due to water vapor, but 0.04% of the air in your face is going to KILL earth?

Just reason, think, it's not hard to see truth. Cloudy COLD=warmer than clear sky. Cloudy HOT = cooler than clear sunny....see right out your window. C02 same in all examples.

[chuckChuck]

Flipper you are wrong about water vapour. Again you don't understand the science.

Water vapour does not cause the original warming. It amplifys warming because it is a positive feed back loop!

[url]https://science.nasa.gov/earth/climate-change/steamy-relationships-how-atmospheric-water-vapor-amplifies-earths-greenhouse-effect/[/url]

Some people mistakenly believe water vapor is the main driver of Earth’s current warming. But increased water vapor doesn’t cause global warming. Instead, it’s a consequence of it. Increased water vapor in the atmosphere amplifies the warming caused by other greenhouse gases.

Earth's water cycle.

NASA It works like this: As greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane increase, Earth’s temperature rises in response. This increases evaporation from both water and land areas. Because warmer air holds more moisture, its concentration of water vapor increases. Specifically, this happens because water vapor does not condense and precipitate out of the atmosphere as easily at higher temperatures. The water vapor then absorbs heat radiated from Earth and prevents it from escaping out to space. This further warms the atmosphere, resulting in even more water vapor in the atmosphere. This is what scientists call a "positive feedback loop." Scientists estimate this effect more than doubles the warming that would happen due to increasing carbon dioxide alone.

[TSIPP]

Put the crack pipe down chuckroach, more water vapour will bring more rain!

[chuckChuck]

Do you not read any of the responses on here? Or are you just utterly unable to comprehend them?

A couple of weeks ago, in response to you posting this exact topic, I posted an article from NOAA indicating that the exact opposite is happening.
Actual measured atmospheric water vapour is decreasing, while the models claim it should be increasing.

So with a warming atmosphere and less moisture then that will potentially mean less rain. Try to connect the dots! Sounds like more drought!

[Tucker]

I watched a video this morning of Guyana's President regarding climate change. It might be of interest to some of you. Is there hypocrisy when it comes to Canada too?

https://twitter.com/i/status/1773821993403723893

[blueversi]

I watched a video this morning of Guyana's President regarding climate change. It might be of interest to some of you. Is there hypocrisy when it comes to Canada too?
https://twitter.com/i/status/1773821993403723893

Absolutely, except we don’t have a leader we have a pawn.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So with a warming atmosphere and less moisture then that will potentially mean less rain. Try to connect the dots! Sounds like more drought!

This chart from the epa's website using NOAA data seems to indicate the opposite trend is occurring.
But they must be denier organizations.

World data looks similar.

Perhaps you should leave science to the scientists. You are doing irreparable harm to The credibility of actual scientists when you fabricate data such as this.