Trends

[agstar77]

The trend is not your friend.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Unless of course you happen to be a plant or any other organism that requires co2 to perform photosynthesis, in which case the trend is your friend.

Speaking of trend, I see a real trend of climate change threads lately.
Even the political threats such as the one making fun of Trudeau turned into a climate change thread.

[furrowtickler]

Check the graph on who is emitting the vast majority of “greenhouse” gasses by volume … Canada not even on scope ..
So why throw shade on here at us ?????????
why are a handful of you desperately trying to kill ag in Canada ??

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Or if you happen to be any organism further up the food chain whose survival is dependent upon eating organisms that perform photosynthesis, then the trend is your friend.

[agstar77]

This is a combination of three gases. At what level is it a concern?

[furrowtickler]

This is a combination of three gases. At what level is it a concern?

Ask China , India and the ones responsible

[AlbertaFarmer5]

This is a combination of three gases. At what level is it a concern?

Glad you asked. At 2,000 ppm, methane is lethal. It is currently less than two ppm, so when it reaches 1000 times higher than the current concentration, it would be a concern.
CO2 is immediately dangerous to life and health at 40,000 parts per million. We should probably be concerned when it reaches five digits.
Nitrous oxides are considered hazardous at 150 parts per million. They are currently at 0.3 ppm. No cause for alarm quite yet.

[chuckChuck]

Lesson 1. Dont ask flat earthers about the eclipse or climate science!

A5 says we are going to run out of CO2 if we don't keep burning fossil fuels! I guess he hasn't heard of the carbon cycle!

Hotter and drier summers are good for us!

He's our resident pretendgineer and pretend libertarian.

And GHG emissions are going to keep going up unless we reduce carbon emissions from burning fossil fuels.

[fjlip]

You stated ice ages came and went with C02 under 300 ppm? How did the warm/melting happen then? Lower C02 than now?

I See, C02 is NOT the cause or effect!

[checking]

Agstar77.

Do you know that your posted C02 graph says it all about how worked up the human total really is about GHGs?

Meanwhile, you and a few individuals who reproduce graphs on the subject forget to chart your stress trend line that tandems your GHG graphs. There has got to be a relationship, if you seriously care of what you post?

Have you, or cc. ever tested your use of carbon thru the decades via a graph to show us flat earthers that you practising anything but use of bandwidth?

I won't ask about your stress trend lines because when you two peak it, you will flat line.