Environment “Climate Change” Canada

[rumrocks]

I couldn't think of a worse position to be in than having to pubically pretend to go along with wishes of the person who writes your payroll cheque even though you know it's all a charade orchestrated by one narcissist.
Think of the employees of CBC, RCMP, Invironment Canada, liberal MP's, and civil servants who are caught in this dilemma in Ottawa. Guarded whispers. But to speak out would be financial suicide. Making mortgage payments are more important.

The day will arrive and it will be a glorious.

[sumdumguy]

Chuck, you say they manipulated one weather station, why not all. They probably manipulate all they can and how would you know? In a court of law, if you falsify one item, you are guilty of fraud. Fraud is an indictable offense. Lock Them Up!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I couldn't think of a worse position to be in than having to pubically pretend to go along with wishes of the person who writes your payroll cheque even though you know it's all a charade orchestrated by one narcissist.
Think of the employees of CBC, RCMP, Invironment Canada, liberal MP's, and civil servants who are caught in this dilemma in Ottawa. Guarded whispers. But to speak out would be financial suicide. Making mortgage payments are more important.

The day will arrive and it will be a glorious.

As the Nuremberg trials proved, the excuse that I was just doing my job is not valid. All of these people playing along to get along are equally responsible for the damage these destructive policies are inflicting.

The world needs a lot more people like Jordan Peterson to tell the truth, and stand up to the tyranny.

[chuckChuck]

So all the climate scientists around the world are part of the conspiracy and wrong!

BL must be proud of his science denying comrades!

[fjlip]

Bribed or coerced...$$$ talks, WEF evil agenda...

[TSIPP]

Bribed or coerced...$$$ talks, WEF evil agenda...

If you don’t go along with the rest of the climate wackos you get canceled.

[shtferbrains]

How much does it effect the data when you go from 450 reporting stations to less than 150?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

How much does it effect the data when you go from 450 reporting stations to less than 150?

That depends on how the remaining stations were Cherry picked, and what agenda was behind that action

[WiltonRanch]

I’ve stayed out of talking about the climate change debate as I honestly am no scientist. That said, the sky is falling crowd is as fanatical as a death cult. In another topic cc said I was comparing climate change proponents to Hitler but actually I was alluding to him and the fanatics. Even if carbon emissions are causing climate change what is the ultimate result? Will the results of the draconian measures if taken to the full extent be worth the consequences vs the consequences of not doing anything? I know there is the other argument if nothing is done and everything goes to hell in a hand basket but the biggest obstacle is no one can prove it either way. Kind of like religion, there is nobody who can quantifiably prove it either way with imperical evidence. That is why the fervour surrounding climate change has become religious and dogmatic in nature and I just tune out from it because emotion and want to believe comes into the equation. Furthermore, wiping out historic weather data from many years ago causes suspicion. Kind of like Nazis and commies burning books they didn’t agree with or Constantine determining which books would constitute the holy bible.

[furrowtickler]

I’ve stayed out of talking about the climate change debate as I honestly am no scientist. That said, the sky is falling crowd is as fanatical as a death cult. In another topic cc said I was comparing climate change proponents to Hitler but actually I was alluding to him and the fanatics. Even if carbon emissions are causing climate change what is the ultimate result? Will the results of the draconian measures if taken to the full extent be worth the consequences vs the consequences of not doing anything? I know there is the other argument if nothing is done and everything goes to hell in a hand basket but the biggest obstacle is no one can prove it either way. Kind of like religion, there is nobody who can quantifiably prove it either way with imperical evidence. That is why the fervour surrounding climate change has become religious and dogmatic in nature and I just tune out from it because emotion and want to believe comes into the equation. Furthermore, wiping out historic weather data from many years ago causes suspicion. Kind of like Nazis and commies burning books they didn’t agree with or Constantine determining which books would constitute the holy bible.

Very good post, on many levels

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Will the results of the draconian measures if taken to the full extent be worth the consequences vs the consequences of not doing anything?

We aren't allowed to have that discussion. We skipped right over the cost benefit analysis.
The few people who have dared to analyze the costs, such as the environmentalist Bjorn Lomborg have concluded that the do nothing option is far more cost effective in all ways.

And that is based on the unproven assumption that CO2 controls the climate in the first place. That discussion is even more taboo.

[chuckChuck]

Wilton you keep bringing up the Nazi analogy along with stupid conspiracy theories which have been dismissed.

Even the probable next Conservative Prime Minister says human caused climate change is real.

So why do you remain so skeptical about something that is scientific fact?