Climate change will knock one-third off world economy, study shows

[shtferbrains]

In actual fact, Africa seems to be doing much better than the stereotype.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

And some farms in the dryer parts of the prairies have enjoyed a few decades of above average precipitation.
Do a few years Of dryer weather indicate a return to normalcy? Or is that the climate change?

[furrowtickler]

Mid west US

[sumdumguy]

I think that climate change PROPAGANDA has already destroyed the economy. Sickening!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I think that climate change PROPAGANDA has already destroyed the economy. Sickening!

That is of course a feature and not a bug.

[chuckChuck]

So which scientific organizations are saying that there is no human caused climate change and nothing to worry about. None. Other wise you would have posted them long ago! So give up!

Even PP says its real. And so do Alberta and Saskatchewan premiers because they both have carbon taxes on large emitters and are touting the benefits of carbon capture and nuclear to reduce emissions.

Why would they have programs to reduce carbon emissions if they don't think greenhouse gases are a problem? Try to put 2 and 2 together!

They are dragging their feet because their oil buddy supporters are worried.

So you guys must be a lonely isolated bunch with your climate change denial, antiscience fringe views unsupported by any credible scientific organization.

[furrowtickler]

Soil moisture level continue to rebuild rapidly across most North American crop areas that went through a few dry years and a drought cycle .
Natural change in El Niño always has an effect on moisture patterns.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You should just cut and paste your own posts. They are basically all identical. It would save a lot of time.

Or you could try coming up with some new material. Perhaps even your own original thoughts.

[furrowtickler]

It’s extremely pathetic already , Chuck should just give up

[furrowtickler]

Chuck are you busy practicing the MJ moon walk ?!???

[chuckChuck]

You should just cut and paste your own posts. They are basically all identical. It would save a lot of time.

Or you could try coming up with some new material. Perhaps even your own original thoughts.

Do you mean original unfounded dumb ass thoughts like your "we are going to run out of CO2 if we don't keep burning fossil fuels"?

Thanks for the useless advice, but I'll stick to credible scientific evidence that trumps your flakey ideas everytime. Even if I have to repeat them.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

What is scientific about saying that politicians believe in something, therefore it can't be questioned?

You might want to check on the definition of the scientific method.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck, is it at all possible that you have dogma and science confused?

Because the references to incontrovertible authorities that cannot be questioned rather than scientific evidence which is supposed to be questioned, the way you describe climate change sounds exactly like dogma, and not at all like science.
Yet you continually refer to the terms credible and scientific.

How many of those politicians you defer to are either credible or scientific?

[sumdumguy]

Chuck is going to ask Robert deNiro because he is a brain surgeon.

[cropgrower]

it called brainwashing ,