Well I tell you I've never been jealous of anyone who lives at Hanna or Special Areas! Might wonder about their sanity...but never jealous! LOL
I would think those lands would be prime candidates for sale to the owners? No one else really wants them.
The eastern slopes of the Rockies are a different matter....?
Now once again...I have never owned, or have any desire to own, a grazing lease! I have no desire to put cattle into a community pasture! If I wanted to be an absentee owner maybe I would think different!
The guy who complained about every Tom, Dick and Harry on his grazing lease due to oil leases...how is that any different than private land? I have hunters, kids riding snowmobile/quads/horses as well as hikers/birders on my land all the time! Few if any ask and quite frankly I don't care as long as they pack their beer cans/whisky bottles home with them! I have no problem with people enjoying my little bit of paradise!
I'm not sure if the grazing leaseholder was bragging or complaining about the surface lease he got? I think his adverse effect was in the ballpark($1750...in my high end market we get $1850)? His loss of production was not bad...he states it takes 50 acres per cow!? Our loss of production is $325/acre on prime black soil cropland!
If he thought his land costs were too low....well he is in the sticks...and it IS lease land? I would say he did very well?
The bottom line is this: If there was never a cow on the grazing leases, the people of Alberta would recieve a considerable larger sum of money than any grazing fees/taxes that might go into the government coffers. That is a fact. Tom Thurber headed a committee to look into it and that was his findings...that is not in dispute. The Klein government didn't implement his findings because of politics! Old Jack Horner rallied the troops and Klein came out looking like a complete fool(which happened often in his reign)! Never again will any Tory premier take on those welfare cows...just a fact.
I would think those lands would be prime candidates for sale to the owners? No one else really wants them.
The eastern slopes of the Rockies are a different matter....?
Now once again...I have never owned, or have any desire to own, a grazing lease! I have no desire to put cattle into a community pasture! If I wanted to be an absentee owner maybe I would think different!
The guy who complained about every Tom, Dick and Harry on his grazing lease due to oil leases...how is that any different than private land? I have hunters, kids riding snowmobile/quads/horses as well as hikers/birders on my land all the time! Few if any ask and quite frankly I don't care as long as they pack their beer cans/whisky bottles home with them! I have no problem with people enjoying my little bit of paradise!
I'm not sure if the grazing leaseholder was bragging or complaining about the surface lease he got? I think his adverse effect was in the ballpark($1750...in my high end market we get $1850)? His loss of production was not bad...he states it takes 50 acres per cow!? Our loss of production is $325/acre on prime black soil cropland!
If he thought his land costs were too low....well he is in the sticks...and it IS lease land? I would say he did very well?
The bottom line is this: If there was never a cow on the grazing leases, the people of Alberta would recieve a considerable larger sum of money than any grazing fees/taxes that might go into the government coffers. That is a fact. Tom Thurber headed a committee to look into it and that was his findings...that is not in dispute. The Klein government didn't implement his findings because of politics! Old Jack Horner rallied the troops and Klein came out looking like a complete fool(which happened often in his reign)! Never again will any Tory premier take on those welfare cows...just a fact.
Comment