How does a guy run a 40 quarter farm being wrong every single day.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Alberta’s drought shaping up to be ‘worse than we saw in the 1920s, 1930s’
Collapse
Logging in...
Welcome to Agriville! You need to login to post messages in the Agriville chat forums. Please login below.
X
-
After 40 plus years of lies from the climate alarmists why shud we believe them now CC ? and WHY shud we take lectures from some of the greatest climate hypocrites in the world ? stay at home while i fly/cruise around the world in my private jet or huge yacht powered by big diesel engines , don't be a useful idiot CC
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Originally posted by jazz View PostIf chuck was expecting a mega drought, how deep did he seed. Is his crop even up yet?
- Likes 2
Comment
-
Reminds me of back in Ireland they were on about putting Gondolas on a lake for recreation etc , one politician stood up and said , who will feed them on the winter !?, some people never learn to keep their mouth closed when they don't know what they are talking about ! we wont mention any names
- Likes 3
Comment
-
Talking to a relative who works in the Hannah Oyen area drilling water wells and he said it was very green out there, lots of rain. It was good to hear, has been very dry last few years. Talking to my herbicide guy this morning, his main service area is Stettler east. North of Stettler he said was very dry. Looking at the most recent forecast he wasn’t planning on ordering much fungicide, didn’t feel he would sell much. Field scouting wasn’t showing much leaf disease. So I don’t know. We are sitting at just under 5 inches since May 1, could certainly use more rain.
Comment
-
Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
Now it must be time for you and your flat earth friends to tell us all the climate scientists are wrong!
More of this coming every day now.
You can't stifle true science.
The soviets tried but that ended badly.
Joe Oliver: Scientific method counters climate alarmism
A submission to the Hague Court by three distinguished U.S. scientists challenges the basic premises of net-zero policies targeting CO2
“It doesn’t matter how beautiful your theory is, it doesn’t matter how smart you are. If it doesn’t agree with experiment, it’s wrong.” To be reliable, science must be based on observations consistent with predictions, rather than consensus, peer reviews, opinions of government controlled bodies like the IPCC and definitely not cherry-picked, exaggerated or falsified data. The paper makes the point colloquially: “Peer review of the climate literature is a joke. It is pal review.”
- Likes 4
Comment
-
-
Where are the references, links and names for that opinion?
As usual, nothing but crickets!
So other than science, how else would you suggest we understand the planet? Should we go back to just looking out the window, superstition and blame everything on the gods and the evil spirits?
Peer review is just pal review? LOL How could thousands of scientists around the world all be pals?
So what credible scientific organization says human caused climate change is not happening? Crickets and more crickets!
We are waiting!
Comment
-
Censorship is what its called , even google said all data that dont fit the propaganda is pushed away down and made hard to find , also no point posting anything as no matter what answer is always the sameLast edited by cropgrower; Jul 3, 2024, 18:01.
- Likes 1
Comment
-
-
-
-
-
So you have climate change denial opinions, but not one of you can find any scientific organization that says human caused climate change is not happening but if it is, it's going to be good for the planet?
Get your homework done and show us the scientific organizations that back up your flakey opinions!
Comment
- Reply to this Thread
- Return to Topic List
Comment