No B.C. Fruit This Year

[AlbertaFarmer5]

"Permanent climate change" now that is rich charles. Do you even think about what your thinking about?

It is obvious that the low information non-critical thinker ChuckChuck's of the world are the target audience for the propagandists who write this science fiction.

They must also be big fans of George Carlin:
Think of how stupid the average person is, and realize half of them are stupider than that. George Carlin

[chuckChuck]

So you think a permanent El Nino every year all year long is going to be good for you?

Ok then that explains it then. More CO2 and drought is what you want!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So you think a permanent El Nino every year all year long is going to be good for you?

Ok then that explains it then. More CO2 and drought is what you want!

How can one phase of a cyclical phenomenon be permanent?
Do you understand anything at all about heat transfer?
Edit: Refer to the George Carlin quote above.

[chuckChuck]

Warming oceans. That is what El Nino is, a warming of parts of the pacific. 90% of the energy of global warming has gone into the oceans. Imagine if the warming of the pacific is more or less permanent and keeps increasing.

Naw, you can't because you believe it's all good for us!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck, when you and your rubber ducky have your bath time tonight, ask your mom to put all of the hot water in one end of the bathtub and all of the cold water in the other end of the bathtub so that you can replicate a permanent El nino. And let us know how permanent that temperature differential is.

Everyday we experience this thing called weather, such as the insufferable wind we have all been tolerating lately. That is the Earth equalizing the temperature differential from hot areas to cold areas.
You can't have a permanent El nino, that would be like trying to exhale permanently. Although you could try that experiment too. And let us know the results.

[fjlip]

Ha Ha Ha

[chuckChuck]

So A5 warming oceans will have no impact on the climate? LOL

That makes about as much sense as we need to keep burning fossil fuels or we are going to run out of CO2!

And a permanent el nino is a metaphor for warming oceans so the class clowns can understand the impact. Warmer oceans equals warmer drier climate. Get it?

[url]https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content[/url]

Climate Change: Ocean Heat Content

Rising amounts of greenhouse gases are preventing heat radiated from Earth’s surface from escaping into space as freely as it used to. Most of the excess atmospheric heat is passed back to the ocean. As a result, upper ocean heat content has increased significantly over the past few decades. Upper layers are accumulating heat faster than deeper layers, but averaged over the full depth of the ocean, the 1993–2022 heat-gain rates are approximately 0.64 to 0.83 Watts per square meter averaged over the surface of the Earth.

Heat absorbed by the ocean is moved from one place to another, but it doesn’t disappear. The heat energy eventually re-enters the rest of the Earth system by melting ice shelves, evaporating water, or directly reheating the atmosphere. Thus, heat energy in the ocean can warm the planet for decades after it was absorbed. If the ocean absorbs more heat than it releases over a given time span, its heat content increases. Knowing how much heat energy the ocean absorbs and releases is essential for understanding and modeling global climate.

More than 90 percent of the warming that has happened on Earth over the past 50 years has occurred in the ocean. Recent studies ([url]http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_Chapter03_FINAL.pdf[/url]) estimate that warming of the upper oceans accounts for about 63 percent of the total increase in the amount of stored heat in the climate system from 1971 to 2010, and warming from 700 meters down to the ocean floor adds about another 30 percent.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Chuck, you were telling me we are going to have a permanent El nino. That is hot water in one specific area and cold water in another specific area of the oceans. A cycle that shifts back and forth as it has been for as long as humans have been observing it. You told me that will become permanent. That somehow that hot water will never find its way to the cold water.
Did you perform the bathtub experiment I suggested? Did all of the hot water stay in one end of the bathtub and all the cold water stay in the other end?

Now you have moved the goal posts again in an attempt to deflect from being proven wrong. Now you are talking about ocean heat content in total. Did you forget when we discussed this previously and showed the physical impossibility of the atmosphere warming the ocean on anything short of geological time scales?

This excuse that the ocean ate the missing global warming is the warmunist equivalent of the dog ate my homework.

[shtferbrains]

The oceans have always ate the warming and much of the Co2.
How do you measure temp and height in something changing by the minute in such a vast area?

The science is settled.

But large areas of the oceans are virtualy unexplored.

[chuckChuck]

Have you heard of satellites Shite fur brains?

[url]https://sealevel.nasa.gov/faq/19/[/url]how-do-satellites-measure-sea-level-change/

And A5 you don't have to take the permanent el nino metaphor literally. But don't let that stop you from coming up with more dumb ass ideas! Like a warming atmosphere can't warm the oceans

What part of the following don't you understand? Are you really this clueless? Probably! Is it time for you to run away again?

"Rising amounts of greenhouse gases are preventing heat radiated from Earth’s surface from escaping into space as freely as it used to. Most of the excess atmospheric heat is passed back to the ocean. As a result, upper ocean heat content has increased significantly over the past few decades. Upper layers are accumulating heat faster than deeper layers, but averaged over the full depth of the ocean, the 1993–2022 heat-gain rates are approximately 0.64 to 0.83 Watts per square meter averaged over the surface of the Earth."