• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Trump tariff focus is short-sighted

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Trump tariff focus is short-sighted

    Trump tariff focus is short-sighted

    Tariffs hurt all countries involved: Too bad the Trump campaign missed that memo

    By Alan Guebert ([url]https://www.manitobacooperator.ca/contributor/alan-guebert/[/url])



    Trump made tariffs his weapon of choice in his first term in office. Photo: Jonathan Ernst/Reuters Milton Friedman, the patron saint of free markets and a founder of the Nobel-adorned Chicago school of economics, took a very dim view of tariffs.
    ADVERTISEMENT

    Writing in “Capitalism and Freedom,” his surprising 1962 best seller, Friedman explained that if unilateral free trade is the goal, “reciprocal negotiations of tariff reductions … seems wrong.”

    First, it’s too slow, and in the second place, he continued, “(i)t makes it appear as if tariffs help the country imposing them but hurt the other countries. In truth, the situation is quite different. Our tariffs hurt us as well as other countries.”
    That’s Friedman’s entire tariff seminar: “Our tariffs hurt us as well as other countries.”
    He adds that “(w)e would be benefited by dispensing with our tariffs even if other countries did not.”

    That’s not a political statement. It’s a key tenet of free trade from one of the most influential Nobel laureates in history.
    So what’s changed in world markets, since that Kennedy-era pronouncement, to encourage former president Donald Trump to make import tariffs the centerpiece of his campaign’s economic policy?
    Absolutely nothing. Tariffs — ours, theirs and anyone’s — remain terrible economics.
    ADVERTISEMENT
    For evidence, look at the last Trump tariff fight in 2018 and 2019. That was chiefly on U.S. imports of Chinese steel and aluminum and U.S. exports of ag commodities. Neither tariff delivered what was promised to Americans: more jobs, better economic growth and increased U.S. sales.

    In fact, reported the New York Times on Aug. 27, 2019, “Lucrative contracts that farmers long relied on … have evaporated, with Chinese buyers looking to other nations like Brazil and Canada to get the commodities they need.”
    The story then quotes an American Farm Bureau estimate that “total American agricultural exports to China were $24 billion in 2014 and fell to $9.1 billion last year,” the first year of the Trump tariffs on U.S. commodity exports to China.
    The Times wasn’t the only one to notice Trump’s southbound tariff policy. In January 2020, Forbes reported that the “Trump administration gave more taxpayer dollars to farmers harmed by (its) trade policies than the federal government spends each year building ships for the Navy or maintaining America’s nuclear arsenal.”

    Despite clear evidence, the Trump campaign insists its current push for import tariffs — from 10 per cent on all U.S. imports to 60 per cent or more on U.S. imports from China — will ensure the American economy grows faster than competitors.
    Nonsense, says the Peterson Institute for International Economics, a nonpartisan economic research firm in Washington, D.C.
    “Unlike (today’s) Biden tariffs, the Trump plan is for increased tariffs on all products from all countries,” the institute posted in January.
    ADVERTISEMENT
    That’s “not just America First,” the analysis continues, parroting the Trump campaign’s economic theme. “It is America alone.”
    Tariffs “are in fact added taxes on us, and having them will have real costs.”
    American farmers are very familiar with those costs. Within weeks of imposing 25 per cent import tariffs on Chinese products in 2018, “Beijing accused the United States of ‘launching the largest trade war in economic history,’” reported the Los Angeles Times in July 2018.
    Then it “fired back with dollar-for-dollar tariffs mainly on American farm products and other food,” and looked to other countries to source its needs.
    That’s the exact kind of mutual pain Milton Friedman predicted in 1962.







    #2
    ....tldr

    Comment


      #3
      Oh what? A non original thought from chuck and just another article copied and pasted? No way!!!!

      Comment


        #4
        lol lol lol

        Comment


          #5
          So are you guys like A5 and don't listen to the news or read the newspapers and opinions from columnists?

          Are you rooting for Trump to put a tariff on all Canadian imports? Including ag products.

          Conservatives and Republicans are now opposed to free trade and in favour of governments intervening in the market?

          Quite the turn around in policy for the pro business free enterprise parties.

          Comment


            #6
            To be honest that article surfaced in my feeds earlier this week.
            Are you making a statement or do you have a question?
            Sounds like Smoot-Hawley all over again to me.
            Then again it could be empty talk to get votes.

            Comment


              #7
              "Are you making a statement or do you have a question?"

              Both.

              Comment


                #8
                Free trade was never totally free.
                Protectionism is now popular. Trade disputes now the norm. Regardless of party. Dems killed Keystone. And from memory, their tax plan sounds familiar.
                And the serious negotiations are done after Canada leaves the room.
                So buckle up.
                And get ready for $10 milk as a start.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Trump probably more concerned with where he takes refuge after the election.

                  Iscolationism is the zeitgeist these days. Buckle down. After Trump lost Biden didn’t reverse much of Trumps trade policies.

                  Comment

                  • Reply to this Thread
                  • Return to Topic List
                  Working...