Cheap wind power ????

[AlbertaFarmer5]

A funny thing happens on the way from "cheapest new generation", to most expensive consumer electricity.
Every
Single
Time.

[shtferbrains]

Some areas seem to have much more volitivity in pricing?
Seems the areas that have the higher percentage of wind and solar?

There's that Louisiana/Texas comparison again.

Louisiana is not on board with the renewable future.
Maybe they don't follow Lazards Investment Banks promo spin?

A lot of NH3 production there.

[TSIPP]

The numbers are just like your lefty numbers, make believe fairy tale stories.

[chuckChuck]

Glad you agree Tsipper that Sask Power knows what they are talking about.

[TSIPP]

SaskPower has the real number we just see the fairy tail numbers.

[chuckChuck]

Sask Power's analysis that says wind and solar are the lowest cost new generation sources are not from the real world?

Backed up by Lazards LCOE which has the numbers from numerous examples in the US.

Those aren't real world enough?

Its the flat earthers who are living in a fantasy land!

[TSIPP]

Chuckroach uses the numbers from pixie and unicorn land, just because Chuckroach can find the numbers it doesn’t make the numbers real.

[shtferbrains]

When Bill Gates needs reliable power he doesn't worry about virtue signaling with unreliable wind or solar.
He just restarts Three Mile Island.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Choke on that greenies!

The greenies don't believe in real world data, only theoretical models.

Even though the real world proves them wrong every single time.

Obviously the real world is wrong since it doesn't reflect their unicorn beliefs.

[fjlip]

Except in the real world, where, for example, Germany with wind and solar has electricity prices almost 70% higher than France using nuclear, and Germany has much higher CO2 emissions.

Choke on that greenies!