• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Irrigation project cost would exceed return to provincial government

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #91
    Originally posted by WiltonRanch View Post
    . Once the democrats get their heads out of their asses and realize they need to listen and act upon middle American concerns they will be doomed to where they are.
    It has been interesting watching the Democrats evolve throughout the course of this campaign. At the current pace, they will soon be further right than where the Republicans started out at.

    Apparently they figured out a little too late that woke and climate and aren't election winning strategies. I doubt the Canadian left will ever learn that simple lesson.

    Comment


      #92
      More to getting kids on with Musk, niece and nephews son graduated from engineering in Stoon 5 years ago and got a great job in Fort Mac. They came for him after year 2, paid for a lot of the remainder of school, helped him financially to buy a house and gave raises each year. Musks team called him a year ago and asked if he would do an interview. Would require moving to Texas which he was in favour of. He did the interview, actually a series of interviews and got a job offer. Ended up declining the offer when his current employer gave him a new position and is in the process of moving him to Calgary, where he was originally from. Quite an interesting career so far for a 26 year old. Hope he doesn’t regret letting that move to Texas go.

      Comment


        #93
        Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
        You continue to make this claim.

        As we have discussed in countless times in the past, in complete opposition to denying, I fully embrace the benefits of climate change, and the associated benefits of increased CO2.
        As I have said over and over, as of the end of the last cooling phase in the 70's this area could hardly grow barley and oats, the season was too short, and the heat units were so lacking.
        Now we are successfully growing wheat and long season canola.
        You claim climate change is good for you after a drier than normal year in your area, but if southern Alberta and the US gets hotter and drier and suffers more crop losses you are still okay with that?

        And there are the negative impacts in most of the rest of the world. Which you seem not to be concerned with.

        To summarize, as long as you perceive a personal benefit nothing else matters?

        Well that explains it then!



        Comment

        • Reply to this Thread
        • Return to Topic List
        Working...