Why would loss of sea ice, melting glaciers or ice sheets be negative?
The rebounding polar bear population and penguin populations and their food chains seem to disagree that this is a negative outcome.
Plants and trees colonizing altitudes and latitudes previously too cold for Life seem to disagree.
If you were in charge of the climate dial, how much of the Earth surface should be covered in ice? What is the ideal coverage that would maximize the flourishing of life on Earth?
The rebounding polar bear population and penguin populations and their food chains seem to disagree that this is a negative outcome.
Plants and trees colonizing altitudes and latitudes previously too cold for Life seem to disagree.
If you were in charge of the climate dial, how much of the Earth surface should be covered in ice? What is the ideal coverage that would maximize the flourishing of life on Earth?
Comment