Trumps Former Chief of Staff Call him a Fascist

[AlbertaFarmer5]

And Goalie it doesn't really matter what paper or magazine the 3 former Trump generals were quoted in does it?

Who owns the media that delivered the interviews is irrelevant to the former Trump staff Generals message about Trump.

Aren't you the same poster who continually tells us that Rebel News or any other alternative news source isn't credible because of who owns it?

Now you are claiming that it is irrelevant who owns the media source?

Is this ability to contradict your own posts a result of drinking so much that you don't remember what you post the day before?

Multiple posters? Multiple personality disorder? Or just plain hypocrisy?

[cropgrower]

and yet again cc and aggy don't care about the most vulnerable in society while they yell racist

[A990]

There are appox. one million or 4% of poeple in Canada that are LGBTQ2+.

Have you stopped to wonder what would have happen to them fjlip before calling it a Hitler plus?

LGB have gained many deserved rights and freedoms and many say they just want to live productive lives in peace. But that isn't enough, the rest of the alphabet starts to assert itself and change society. It's a mental health issue not an lgb issue

[foragefarmer]

LGB have gained many deserved rights and freedoms and many say they just want to live productive lives in peace. But that isn't enough, the rest of the alphabet starts to assert itself and change society. It's a mental health issue not an lgb issue

"Yes F A G S were not a Nazi love, actually EXTERMINATION perhaps...

that is a Hitler plus"



That's not what this poster's saying, is it?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I actually wrote a paper in unversity econ class about all the good things that hitler did. My prof called me out about it and said it was one of the best papiers he had read in his years...not so much that it was so well written ( it wasnt, im an idiot) but that it was well researched and thought provoking.
HITLER actually did some economic good in germany.. as they would not be a g7 nation without their wartime economy...

Chuck lives in a spaghetti western. The good guys wear white hats bad guys wear black hats. There are no shades of gray. Everything has to be either all good or all bad. This position requires absolutely no critical thought or intelligence.

And the right is guilty of this as well. Consider the much maligned Trudeau quote that he actually admires the basic dictatorship that is china. But he's not wrong.
Look at how industry and economic growth in Canada is completely hamstrung by some very minute but very well funded special interest groups. A dictatorship such as China can potentially put the good of the many above the narcissism (and economic interests)of the few.
Although, I doubt that is the context he was referring to.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Businesses and farms in the USA rely on immigrants to do a lot of the jobs most people don't want.

So who is going to pick the vegetables and fruits and work in the meat plants, clean the hotels and offices )

I think this reality has not been well communicated by either side of this debate.

Perhaps it needs to be explained to voters that unless they had half a dozen kids of their own, to look after them in their old age, then they probably should be pro immigration. There won't be anyone to staff the nursing home when they get old and there won't be anyone to pay the taxes to cover the social programs, let alone enough essential workers to keep the lights on and the infrastructure functioning.
Well the current system may be not very effective at separating the wheat from the chaff, it is highly effective at attracting the right demographics.

[cropgrower]

Rounding millions up and putting them in camps? How far would he go? It is telling that you even think that.

its not too long ago that your colleagues wanted to put the ones that did not want untested clot shot in camps

[fjlip]

That was about as facist as it can get

[AlbertaFarmer5]

its not too long ago that your colleagues wanted to put the ones that did not want untested clot shot in camps

It's called projection. Accuse your opponent of doing what you yourself are guilty of.

[agstar77]

It's called projection. Accuse your opponent of doing what you yourself are guilty of.

Trump does it every time he speaks.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Trump does it every time he speaks.

For example?

I once read some wise advice regarding having an argument or debate. Using the words every time or never were always is not a good strategy.
Can you back up your assertion that every time Trump speaks he is projecting?

[agstar77]

For example?

I once read some wise advice regarding having an argument or debate. Using the words every time or never were always is not a good strategy.
Can you back up your assertion that every time Trump speaks he is projecting?

You have never heard him say crooked Joe, even though he is the one convicted. That is just one of many. Sleepy Joe. Etc.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

You have never heard him say crooked Joe, even though he is the one convicted. That is just one of many. Sleepy Joe. Etc.

I haven't, but that could be because I've never listened to one of his speeches either. Sounds like you have been listening to all of his speeches if you can state that he says this every time he speaks, so I will take your word for it.

Edit, do you think either one of them is not a crook?

[agstar77]

I haven't, but that could be because I've never listened to one of his speeches either. Sounds like you have been listening to all of his speeches if you can state that he says this every time he speaks, so I will take your word for it.

Edit, do you think either one of them is not a crook?

Only one has been convicted and will be sentenced. It is not Biden. Only one has lost a civil suit of sexual assault and defamation. It is not Biden.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

Only one has been convicted and will be sentenced. It is not Biden. Only one has lost a civil suit of sexual assault and defamation. It is not Biden.

Do you suppose that outcome had anything to do with which was in power, and which wasn't?
Otherwise known as lawfare.