Social media ban

[TSIPP]

I’m pretty sure nobody is frothing, anyone that gets worried about chuckroach left this site long ago, he’s just a sad pathetic little man….

[cropgrower]

Because supporting it makes people like you froth at the mouth.

It’s like a teenager choosing the complete opposite of their parents to get on their nerves.

Little to do with actual opinions, it’s all about the reaction.

looks like you think all that madness from the left nutters is good also
and you are right cc acts like a teenager

[Blaithin]

looks like you think all that madness from the left nutters is good also
and you are right cc acts like a teenager

You have almost next to no idea what I think is a good or bad idea regarding any of it. Although one should be able to extrapolate something of my feelings just from my support of Australia's social media ban.

If me thinking your constant extreme reaction to Chuck's antagonism is just falling into his trap means that I think like Chuck, so be it. I'm sure people come to dumber conclusions daily.

[cropgrower]

You have almost next to no idea what I think is a good or bad idea regarding any of it. Although one should be able to extrapolate something of my feelings just from my support of Australia's social media ban.

If me thinking your constant extreme reaction to Chuck's antagonism is just falling into his trap means that I think like Chuck, so be it. I'm sure people come to dumber conclusions daily.

saying people that want kids protected are frothing at the mouth sure shows that you don't want to hear what they have to say , that gives a very good indication of where you stand to me
Block me if you don't want too read my frothing at the mouth or just scroll on past

[biglentil]

1000%

[shtferbrains]

• https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1863780800858124770?s=19

[Landdownunder]

If me thinking your constant extreme reaction to Chuck's antagonism is just falling into his trap means that I think like Chuck, so be it. I'm sure people come to dumber conclusions daily.[/QUOTE]

Think you misunderstood Blaithins context here. No need to block shes summed it up well. Cut chuck some slack let him antagonise one doesnt have to respond or read. A few of us on here have a mutual friend of chucks and has messaged some of us. Let him rant and vent.

[WiltonRanch]

Wouldn’t be a bad idea to limit the filth kids are exposed to on the internet but so many ways around it for tech savvy kids. Seen a few local examples of kids offing themselves because of online bullying and also being lured by adults posing as kids. An outright ban on social media is hard to enforce. Besides they may as well get ready for battle on Agriville.

[Landdownunder]

Parental control or allowance of their own kids is allowed via parents log in etc. Probably be circumvented by two accounts under parents name one for parents one for kids errr back to square one???

[sumdumguy]

It’s rediculous! Kids go to public school and are inundated with same garbage day in and day out. You all know what I mean. Kids don’t ask for the BS that pops up on their computer and social media feeds from time to time. My grandsons don’t want it and complain that they are not appreciating all the garbage. I suspect lots of kids raised in decent homes say the same. They are entitled to say, “shove it”.