• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Hydro-Québec CEO hails Labrador projects as examples of Canada getting stuff done

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    Hydro-Québec CEO hails Labrador projects as examples of Canada getting stuff done

    Hydro-Québec CEO hails Labrador projects as examples of Canada getting stuff done

    ?As domestic governments prepare to rework their economic relationships with U.S. president-elect Donald Trump’s incoming administration, the CEO of Hydro-Québec is pitching last week’s launch of a $33-billion renewable power project as an example of why Canada should be considered a serious business partner.

    Last Thursday, the premiers of Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador set aside decades of acrimony to announce an agreement ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-churchill-falls-quebec-newfoundland-labrador-hydroelectricity/[/url]) to develop three massive hydroelectric facilities on the Churchill River. The developments will produce 9,190 megawatts of electricity under a pricing regime that will put $1-billion annually into Newfoundland’s coffers while providing Hydro-Québec with power at half the cost of alternative projects.

    “These projects are clear statements that Canada has the ability to do big things,” Michael Sabia, chief executive officer at Hydro-Québec, said in an interview on Friday.

    Hydro-Québec is a major player in the U.S. electrical grid after striking a 20-year agreement to sell electricity to Massachusetts in 2018 and a similar deal with New York City in 2020. Mr. Sabia, who served as deputy minister of finance prior to joining Hydro-Québec in 2023, said Canada will build its credibility with U.S. politicians by increasing its ability to be a reliable partner in areas such as energy, critical minerals and emerging industries such as electric vehicles and data centres.

    “There’s a reset in attitudes taking place in the U.S., with Trump’s election one symbol of that reset,” said Mr. Sabia, who also served as CEO of the Caisse de dépôt et placement du Québec, a global asset manager, and Bell Canada parent BCE Inc.

    “Canada needs to reposition our relationship with the United States, and part of that reset comes from showing the Americans we are serious partners who can do big things right,” Mr. Sabia said.

    Last year, Hydro-Québec completed a 1,550-megawatt power facility on the Romaine River – the utility’s largest project in 50 years – for $7.4-billion, 14 per cent less than the initial estimate of the project’s cost.

    Electricity is already part of the border battle between Canadian leaders and the incoming U.S. president. In a recent social-media post, Mr. Trump threatened to levy 25-per-cent tariffs ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/world/article-trump-tariffs-canada-mexico/[/url]) on all Canadian exports to the United States. In response, Ontario Premier Doug Ford said the province would consider cutting electricity sales to U.S. border states such as Michigan, New York and Wisconsin.

    Ontario exported 13.9 million megawatt-hours of electricity to the U.S. in 2023, about 13 per cent of Canada’s overall power exports ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-hydro-rich-canada-has-traditionally-exported-power-to-the-united/[/url]) to American customers that year, according to Statistics Canada.

    Last Thursday’s agreement will see Hydro-Québec develop a long-discussed 2,250-megawatt project at Gull Island on Churchill River with a $20-billion budget. The utility will also build a new 1,100-megawatt plant at Churchill Falls ([url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/canada/article-quebec-newfoundland-and-labrador-reach-agreement-on-churchill-falls/[/url]) and refurbish existing facilities at the site to add 550 megawatts of capacity.

    Newfoundland will have access to 1,990 megawatts from the new plants, four times the capacity it has today, while the remaining 7,200 megawatts will be sold to Hydro-Québec. The average cost of electricity from new and existing plants in Labrador will be six cents a kilowatt-hour, which would allow Quebec Premier François Legault to continue shifting to a low-carbon economy while providing residents and businesses with power at some of the lowest rates in the industrialized world.

    “There are deep pools of value for all parties in the agreement between Quebec and Newfoundland,” Mr. Sabia said. He said Hydro-Québec is unlikely to strike new export deals to U.S. utilities, as soaring demand for electricity from customers in the province is expected to account for all the new power coming from the Labrador River.

    Negotiations over the price Newfoundland receives for power – the province currently only gets about $20-million annually from the Churchill Falls contract signed in 1969 – and development at Gull Island have played out for years.

    Discussions got serious over the past 12 months, in part because Newfoundland Premier Andrew Furey appointed Karl Smith, former chief financial officer at St. John’s-based utility Fortis Inc., as a negotiator with a mandate to strike a deal. Mr. Sabia said: “This is a well-balanced agreement where both parties can be satisfied because they got what they needed.”

    Newfoundland’s credit rating is expected to rise as the province begins to receive new revenue from Churchill Falls next year, according to Morningstar DBRS. In a report on Saturday, the rating agency said the agreement with Quebec “is likely to lead to gradual improvement in financial risk metrics, but the magnitude of the improvement will depend on how proceeds are used (for program spending, tax relief, or savings/debt repayment).“

    In August, Morningstar DBRS upgraded Newfoundland to a single A rating from single A-low, the first upgrade for the province in 12 years. On Saturday, the rating agency said: “Any improvement in critical ratings factors is likely to be modest and gradual.”

    Hydro-Québec can pay for the three new power plants by borrowing on its own balance sheet. Morningstar DBRS said that “we do not anticipate any material impact on Québec’s credit ratings” out of Thursday’s agreement with Newfoundland.

    “Hydro-Québec has the capacity and expertise to undertake these projects, as evidenced by the recently completed Romaine Complex development, which was delivered under budget,” Morningstar DBRS said.

    [url]https://www.theglobeandmail.com/business/article-hydro-quebec-ceo-hails-labrador-projects-as-examples-of-canada-getting/[/url]

    ?

    #2
    B.C. Announces 9 new wind projects Exempting them from Environmental assessments. Yup that is how they get-r-done Chuck!

    Comment


      #3
      Clear and cold in Alberta this morning, -18, wind producing at less than 10%, what a surprise.

      Comment


        #4
        So is hydro frozen too their Hamloc? LOL

        Its time to measure renewables? But Hamloc you only pick the low days but never the high production days? LOL

        But of course you are one of the knobs who think its either renewables or fossil fuels and you can't have both and still reduce emissions?

        Comment


          #5
          Wind, solar and hydro together add up to 5.5% of consumption in AB this morning. We are importing more than hydro is producing.

          "their Hamloc", I see your pronouns have changed, now you are plural too. Congratulations, you can join we/they.
          Last edited by AlbertaFarmer5; Dec 16, 2024, 09:20.

          Comment


            #6
            What ever happened to muskrat falls. Wasnt that a government run project. An eastern provinces run government project.

            Comment


              #7
              Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
              So is hydro frozen too their Hamloc? LOL

              Its time to measure renewables? But Hamloc you only pick the low days but never the high production days? LOL

              But of course you are one of the knobs who think its either renewables or fossil fuels and you can't have both and still reduce emissions?
              Yup I only pick low days. But it is so easy because they are so frequent! Tonight the total generation is just over 11400 megawatts of which wind generation is 143 megawatts, just over 1% of total generation. Definitely making a big reduction to emissions Chucky!!

              Comment


                #8
                To be fair, we both picked random days last summer even the summer solstice and found the same results.

                Comment


                  #9
                  Originally posted by RD414 View Post
                  What ever happened to muskrat falls. Wasnt that a government run project. An eastern provinces run government project.
                  The muskrat falls dam is on the lower Churchill river meaning that is below the Churchill falls dam. Much like the site C in BC. It has been producing power since 2021 and would have bankrupted newfie ville by now except that ottawa stepped in with a 5.2B bailout. *****bec was not involved in that one. It was Newfoundland and Nova Scotia power (Emera). They have now have a link to sell power into Maine on the cheap that goes through NB and bypasses quebec.

                  Comment


                    #10
                    Looking at the aeso supply and demand report this morning. It goes without saying that wind and solar are irrelevant again as a cold snap engulfs alberta.
                    But regarding hydro. I see the majority of the dispatchable reserve is hydro. It could explain why it is running at far below capacity, it is the easiest quickest cheapest energy source to ramp up and down quickly when the pesky consumers don't match their demands to the unpredictable wind.

                    Comment


                      #11
                      Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                      Looking at the aeso supply and demand report this morning. It goes without saying that wind and solar are irrelevant again as a cold snap engulfs alberta.
                      But regarding hydro. I see the majority of the dispatchable reserve is hydro. It could explain why it is running at far below capacity, it is the easiest quickest cheapest energy source to ramp up and down quickly when the pesky consumers don't match their demands to the unpredictable wind.
                      I was always under the impression that natural gas was the easiest to ramp up and down to compensate for the variability of wind and solar production. I am a bit baffled though, looking at the AESO, solar is even falling flat today at just before 2 pm, should be a good time for solar output. Wind is almost non existent. Solar below 10% of capacity!?

                      Comment


                        #12
                        Originally posted by AlbertaFarmer5 View Post
                        To be fair, we both picked random days last summer even the summer solstice and found the same results.
                        Wow random days! That tells the whole story according to climate change deniers? Just like one cold snap in January proves climate change is not happening! LOL

                        I am sure then that the utilities in Texas, North Dakota, Alberta and Saskatchewan just looked at random days before they installed all their wind and solar!

                        So why not look at annual production? That would require integrity, something A5 and friends sorely lack!
                        Last edited by chuckChuck; Dec 18, 2024, 09:22.

                        Comment


                          #13
                          Integrity lol. So pointing out inconsistent solar and wind production is not accurate in your opinion? Stephen Guilbeault would like all our electricity in Alberta to be supplied by solar and wind, what would you do on the multiple days when there is little to no production?You think it is fine to have 3 sources of generation to in the end supply the same kilowatt! Or lets gloss over how unreliable Solar and wind are and look at total production!!! That lacks integrity in my opinion.

                          Comment


                            #14
                            Who doesn't know wind and solar are intermittent sources Hamloc?

                            Instead you waste our time picking low production days without looking at annual production and their overall contribution?

                            Wind and solar are valuable sources of low carbon emisssion electricity that can cover a lot of our needs. Sure they need baseload, backup and storage, we knew that already.

                            But every province in the country is planning on more renewables to increase supply. Why because they are lower cost quicker to build sources that reduce emissions.

                            So its time for the naysayers to move on accept the reality that according to the International Energy Agency, new renewable investment world wide is much large than new investment in fossil fossil fuels.

                            "The world now invests almost twice as much in clean energy as it does in fossil fuels…"

                            [url]https://www.iea.org/reports/world-energy-investment-2024/overview-and-key-findings[/url]
                            ?
                            Last edited by chuckChuck; Dec 19, 2024, 08:10.

                            Comment


                              #15
                              They admitted the net zero grid by 2035 had a net zero chance of happening and pushed the target out to the middle of never?
                              That's reality.

                              Comment

                              • Reply to this Thread
                              • Return to Topic List
                              Working...