• You will need to login or register before you can post a message. If you already have an Agriville account login by clicking the login icon on the top right corner of the page. If you are a new user you will need to Register.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

As construction of first small modular reactor looms, buyers wait for the final tally

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

    #31
    Chuck only looks at renewables.

    The 55% coal goes unnoticed
    Last edited by shtferbrains; Jan 5, 2025, 16:33.

    Comment


      #32
      Chuck is as dense as a fence post.

      Comment


        #33
        But the flat earthers still can't figure out that with electrical generation you can have all types including renewables during the transition!

        Over 60% of Canada's electricity is already renewable hydro. Quebec and Manitoba lead the way with the lowest cost electricity in the country by far because of renewable hydro.

        In Alberta they don't want any more low cost wind and solar because then they can sell more gas.

        Smith is is not following free market economics, she wants to pick winners and losers and sell more gas. Alberta is closed for billions in business investment that dosen't fit her plan!






        Last edited by chuckChuck; Jan 6, 2025, 08:38.

        Comment


          #34
          Your in denial Chuck.

          Comment


            #35
            Who said anything about not needing base load?

            Apparently Texas and North Dakota have figured it out and still have a lot of renewables and backup!

            Comment


              #36
              So lets have two systems, double triple the costs when ONE would do!


              Idiot

              Comment


                #37
                So are Quebec, Manitoba, North Dakota, and Texas rates double or triple? Nope!

                Renewables prices are based on zero fuel costs. A big advantage over fossil fuels.

                Comment


                  #38
                  Originally posted by chuckChuck View Post
                  So are Quebec, Manitoba, North Dakota, and Texas rates double or triple? Nope!

                  Renewables prices are based on zero fuel costs. A big advantage over fossil fuels.
                  Comparing abundant hydro resources in Quebec and Manitoba to solar and wind is ridiculous. Certainly hydro in those two provinces have proven to be affordable. Hydro is a dependable source of base load power, wind and solar are far from it.

                  Comment


                    #39
                    There is no point in debating a flat earther.
                    He is not open to any facts.

                    The wind and sun are free.
                    Can't beat free.

                    Comment


                      #40
                      CYA when a socialist says free.

                      Comment


                        #41
                        God! New year but same rhetorical arguments Chuck. Your energies are better spent rebuilding the ndp than calling down a bunch of farmers. When the alternative technologies make true economic sense not influenced by carbon tax or regulation then they will be accepted but till then the bs you spew is believable as anything out of Trudeau or Daliwhal’s mouth.

                        Comment


                          #42
                          Originally posted by shtferbrains View Post
                          There is no point in debating a flat earther.
                          He is not open to any facts.

                          The wind and sun are free.
                          Can't beat free.
                          My wife has a saying,
                          Free cheese is in the mousetrap.

                          A neighbor gave my son a "free" boat last summer. Inflatable with a motor. The motor was beyond repair, so he bought a used motor, then another to make a usable motor. The boat had so many leaks and he spent so much on patches, that he gave up on patching and bought another boat to mount the motor onto.

                          Reminds me of free solar energy.

                          Comment


                            #43
                            Can there be a better example than Lada vs Ford?
                            Belarus vs JD?
                            Okay maybe not "fair".
                            If govt had backed Tesla we'd have DC power in our homes? (Edison was AC). Neither with grants.
                            The New Deal built the Grand Coulee dam on a govt incentive.
                            Flooded some Indian lands. (9 years completion).
                            Allowed Alcoa to provide Boeing with aluminum. Flooded the war effort with goods by '45.
                            Question is, where's the money? Who's making it and what are the spin off cash flows?
                            Gov't has a place.
                            But only as an enabler of innovation not a provider of it.
                            In all my years on Agriville, not once has Chuck ever said any more than what he's saying now.
                            Gov't control the only way to get money to the masses. Not once has he acknowledged how to make it in the first place. Or how to keep enough of it to make more of it.
                            If Chuck were Chinese I'd understand the control, but almost every culture knows how to make money.
                            But his doesn't need to. His silver spoon has yet to see the tarnish of reality. Therein the danger.
                            Build whatever the heck you want if it adds value. Duh!

                            Comment


                              #44
                              We have 4-8 short years to push the pendulum back.
                              Like backing an icy hill.
                              12" up, 14" down.
                              The pull of want like gravity.
                              People vote for what makes them feel good.
                              National Socialists only got votes after the Depression kicked in.
                              Rather than trolling like a child, Chuck could do a little better.
                              But doesn't want to.
                              I'm not against windmills.
                              I'm not about trying to tip them.
                              I'm for Taking Care of Business.
                              Which, if pursued by men of a balanced sensibility of values benefits all. Chuck throws everything under one bus. One outcome inevitable. Not the one he sees however. Trying to be Stalin's friend wasn't healthy.

                              Comment


                                #45
                                PP just another man. No more no less, we hope.
                                JT was not. Not by my definition anyway.

                                Comment

                                • Reply to this Thread
                                • Return to Topic List
                                Working...