Kim Jong Un no longer craziest Leader!

[blackpowder]

At least your last statement is true.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I asked agstar more than a week ago how much of the USAID money goes to starving children. So far no answer.
I would think someone so passionate about this worthwhile cause would want to know the answer.
And would be cheering for rooting out the corruption and fraud which is taking away aid from starving children.
Wouldn't you want the answer to be 100% when this is all over??

[ajl]

So the conclusion of the matter is that the turd carney is the craziest leader in the world. Not kim jong any longer.

[agstar77]

I asked agstar more than a week ago how much of the USAID money goes to starving children. So far no answer.
I would think someone so passionate about this worthwhile cause would want to know the answer.
And would be cheering for rooting out the corruption and fraud which is taking away aid from starving children.
Wouldn't you want the answer to be 100% when this is all over??

There is a cargo ship of corn destined for famine which is docked because of the freeze. Usaid does more than feed children.

[A990]

There is a cargo ship of corn destined for famine which is docked because of the freeze. Usaid does more than feed children.

as reported by the guardian, bbc, politico, reuters and others dependent on usaid.
yes usaid does more than feed children it funds foreign "independent" journalism

[AlbertaFarmer5]

as reported by the guardian, bbc, politico, reuters and others dependent on usaid.
yes usaid does more than feed children it funds foreign "independent" journalism

As we are learning, it also funds all of the coups, civil wars, organized crime and oligarchs which created the instability and resulting famine.
So generous of them to set some money aside for famine relief all things considered.
Still no answer as to how much of their budget goes to famine relief.

[agstar77]

Zero now that is shut down.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

So any amount more than zero would be fine with you? If 99% goes to funding terrorism, and 1% to help with the consequences, would that be a good deal for the taxpayers?

[shtferbrains]

Surprise!
They are going to continue with the humanitarian aid in spite of the problems.

It is well known that even this type of aid delivered through UN agencies most often ends up in the hands of terrorists like Hamas and the taliban who use it for control and power over their own people.
Has been that way for generations.
Oh well, that the way it works.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

agstar, let me try asking in a way that might be closer to home for you.

You have posted regularly about your support for pro abortion causes.

Let's assume you donate your hard earned dollar to your favourite pro abortion charity.

You assume that most of the money goes towards the justifiable and worthwhile cause of convincing expectant mothers to kill their babies.

If in reality it turns out that most of their money went to increasing business, such as providing date **** drugs, activism, covert social media campaigns, and of course outright fraud and corruption by the people in the organization. In the end, only a few percent is used to coerce young women not to keep their babies.

At what percent would you stop donating your own money to this cause?

[agstar77]

How has your mind survived in a sewer all these years?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

How has your mind survived in a sewer all these years?

Sounds like you agree how ridiculous the entire scam is when you see it in writing.