Ray Strom Found Guilty

[farmers_son]

http://www.albertacourts.ab.ca/go.aspx?tabid=13

Type Strom in the keyword search.

I think the government will be getting letters and Ray Danyluk has been very interested in this subject.

However....the oil and gas sector also has a position on this subject. They want to have control over the negotiations so that if the advisor helping the landowners negotiates for more than the oil company feels is fair then that advisor can be dealt with severely.

When landowners can access good advice it threatens to blow the whole issue of surface rights compensation wide open. Big oil and gas does not want that to happen as evidenced in the very concentrated and deliberate attempt to shut down Ray Strom.

Will the government side with the oil and gas sector on this one too?

There is a by-election coming up in Shirley McClellan's former riding. By-elections are a great opportunity to let the government know you are unhappy without actually overthrowing the government. I think the voters in that riding should consider very carefully if they really want to throw their vote away on whoever the Conservative candidate will end up being and instead let the government know they are not happy with how the Progressive Conservative government is letting the oil and gas companies deal with landowners. Whether it is no annual compensation for pipelines, ridiculously low annual rents for wells or this garbage about not being able to get help from where ever they want to, this government has consistently favoured the oil and gas companies over landowners. For the voters in that riding, they have a once in 40 year chance to send government a bigger message than just a letter if they choose to do so.

[farmers_son]

The address I pasted in the above post is to for the actual Judges decision concerning Ray Strom.

If you have trouble loading that also try:

http://www.albertacourts.ab.ca/go.aspx?tabid=13&retn=/isysquery/irl9f8b/1/doc

I noted the comments"
Gerald Kress, the Deputy Registrar of Land Agents for the Province of Alberta,
reluctantly concedes that the Land Agents Licensing Act, R.S.A. 2000, c. 53 [“the Act”] creates
an unbalanced playing field for those who are bound by its provisions. Considering the number
of supporters who came to watch Raymond Strom’s trial for contravening s. 3(1)(a) of that
legislation, many landowners agree."

Being active on this issue seems to make a difference.

[coppertop]

FS, regarding the by-election in Shirley's old constituency, if farmers have one lick of common sense they will jump at the opportunity to support Jack Hayden for the PC Nomination. He is a candidate with a wealth of experience dealing with issues that involve rural Alberta. As President of the Alberta Association of Municipal Districts and Counties he rountinely took the government to task on issues where there was a preceived unfairness to rural Albertans. Having said that he certainly understands urban issues as well, but his background is rural. He owns a farm and I would suspect that he, has personally dealt with oil companies and landmen in the past.

I would encourage all those who live in that area and are concerned with this issue to contact Jack and have a dialogue with him before they throw their vote away by choosing to support a candidate from an opposition party in the by-election itself. This is the heart of Tory country we are talking about and certainly there will be a Tory MLA at the end of the day, so it may as well be one that understands and has a track record of fighting for rural Alberta.

[cropduster]

Off topic here I know.....how much did Hayden donate to the federal Libs for his contract work?? Dinning felt that was a prerequiste to success!!! Or are you talking about the candidate from Garden Plain??

[coppertop]

I know Jack Hayden well, and am certain he didn't donate a penny to the federal Liberals. He was appointed by Paul Martin by virtue of his being the Past President of AAMD C. If Jack gets the PC Nomination he will be the next MLA for Drumheller/Stettler and you can rest assured he will be in cabinet before long.

The area has had a cabinet minister for years, so it is doubful of they want to settle for any less. Electing someone from an opposition party will gain absolutely nothing for the constituency.

[coppertop]

cropduster, Jack Hayden did NOT support Dinning so likely didn't support many of Dinning's ideas !!

[cowdog]

Hayburner I understand that the Pine Lake Group has sent a representive to the legislature to talk to the rural caucus about the Strom case. As at all PLSRAG meeting there is always time for discussion and this is a most valid topic for that discussion.

Here is the meeting notice:

PINE LAKE SURFACE RIGHTS ACTION GROUP
PUBLIC IMFORMATION MEETING
at the
ACME Community Centre
139 Allison Street, Acme
APRIL 9TH, 2007 @ 7:30 PM doors open 6:30 PM
Members free - Memberships @ the door
Non-members - $10 Industry and Regulators - $50

Guest Speakers:
Andrew Nikiforuk, award winning Alberta journalist and author will be presenting: Use of Water by Oil and Gas Industry.
- Andrew, an active member of the Livingston Landowner group, has garnered national acclaim for his journalism. His work regularly appears in both national newspapers, Canadian Business, Saturday Night, Maclean’s, Report on Business, Equinox and Harrowsmith to mention but a few magazines it appears in. He also is the writer the Land Advocate. He has also written several acclaimed books including: Schools Out, The Fourth Horseman, Saboteurs and his most recent Pandemoniun.
Kevin Niemi and Glenn Norman, both of whom are farmers, landowners and directors of the Pine Lake Group will be presenting: Surface Rights Agreements: Empowering Landowners.
- This presentation was prepared for the 2007 Farm Tech Conference in Edmonton, where attendees rated it as one of the best sessions of the conference. The presentation is designed to empower landowners to think and act differently when confronted by energy industry or their intended intrusions onto your property. It is packed full of thoughts, concepts, ideas and is a must for landowners facing ever increasing numbers of CBM, shale gas, geo-thermal and CO2 sequestering wells in the near future.

EVERYONE IS WELCOME TO COME

[farmers_son]

Regarding the byelection…I am sure all of the people seeking the PC nomination are very qualified. And I am sure the people in that riding can be counted upon to vote PC even if the PC candidate was a registered sex offender. Come to think of it one of the previous elected officials in that area actually was a sex offender. However a by-election does offer the voters in that riding a chance to voice their unhappiness with the government without actually overthrowing the government.

They can vote PC during the general election in a couple of years. But now is now. They can send a letter if they want and that would be good or they can make their vote speak for them by voting for anyone other than the PC candidate, whoever that might end up being. Lets consider some of the issues:

• Well site and easement payments that are little changed much since the 1980s while the farmer can hardly afford to buy fuel.
• Oil and gas sector using fresh water to increase production while the farmers have to have a license to dig a dugout, coal bed methane and seismic threatening farm water wells.
• Billions spent on roads and infrastructure in the cites while there has been little or no rural secondary highways built in the last 20 or so years.
• Two levels of health care in the province, one level for the cities and another poorer level for the rural areas. Rural hospitals closed and service drastically reduced. Today, in many areas of rural Alberta you are dead if you have a heart attack where before Klein there would have been health care close by.
• Government clawing back CAIS overpayments at the same time cow calf producers have had to bear the cost of BSE on their shoulders. The governments solution is to give farmers a loan.
• No reference margins left on CAIS safety net after government let CAIS reference margins deplete through successive years of drought and BSE, leaving the government to say those affected producers are poor managers.
• Government not letting landowners have access to advice from whoever they want in dealings with the oil companies, just parroting the oil companies position.
• In that particular riding, no support from government for vital water/irrigation while the Government instead supports water for a horse race track near Calgary.
• Crop insurance premiums that are not affordable while coverage levels have dropped.

Shirley McClellan was the best MLA that region is ever going to get yet what was the last time there was a paved road built in that constituency? I think it is a fair comment to say that the PCs are a government by and for the oil companies. Now I know none of the opposition parties are very impressive but the PCs have been taking the farmers vote for granted. If landowners and farmers want government to pay attention to them instead of big oil and gas they need to consider that nothing is going to change if they vote PC in that by-election.

Like what is there to loose? A road or a hospital? There is nothing to loose by voting for anything else than the PC candidate in a by-election and maybe the opportunity to have your voice heard for a change.

[coppertop]

FS, I really think you are taking a low shot at electors in any constituency when you infer that they would knowingly elect a registered sex offender as their MLA.

If you have issues regarding landmen, then try and stick to those vs going on a tangent that insults the integrity of anyone entering a polling station.

The issue with landmen is not unique to Settler/Drumheller, it is provincewide as far as I know. I can't understand your logic in thinking that the voters of one constituency will have anything to gain by sending a member of the opposition to the Legislature where they will have calluses on their backside from sitting in the nosebleed section of the backbench. Better to lobby the current government, particularly the rural caucus to push to amend what appears to be poor and outdated legislation. Remember, the urban voters within that constituency likely don't give a tinkers damn about landmen, and will likely not take it up as a cause during the by-election.

I don't know whether the folks in Stettler/Drumheller rate their MLA by the amount of paved roads they receive, I know I sure don't. Shirley must have been doing something right, she served the constituency for almost 20 years.

[hayburner]

Thanks Cowdog Since I asked the question a newspaper article came with some more information. I have talked to many a neighbor about this Strom case and there are alot of common concerns that we should beable to have any one we want to help with signing any agreement that comes before us. I have tried to do it myself over the years now I am trying play catch up with what some of others were offered . I trusted the lad that came to drill a couple of oil wells on my place and I have regretted trusting him for the last 10 years. once bitten twice shy as the saying goes.