Just got done watching a sound bite on the proposed high-speed train between Calgary and Edmonton. They are spending $1 million on a feasibility study for the $1 billion plus project.
The rail line will have to go somewhere and I am not sure but do believe that the old rail lines will not be able to accomodate these high speed trains. So, in doing all of this feasibility, does anyone know if they have bothered to talk with the public and/or the landowners that may be impacted by the whole thing?
If the proposed AltaLink line is creating as much controversy as it is, what makes them think that a rail line will be any better accepted?
Seems to me we always undertake "feasibility" studies and never bother to start the discussions with landowners etc. at the same time. What about any environmental impacts, loss of development potential etc.?
Might be a good idea for those who travel the roads frequently, but those who might be affected the most i.e. landowners who will have to abide by the lines going through their land are never really considered. Wouldn't it be wonderful if the discussions went on concurrently so that when the time came to move forward, it wouldn't be so much of a struggle?
The rail line will have to go somewhere and I am not sure but do believe that the old rail lines will not be able to accomodate these high speed trains. So, in doing all of this feasibility, does anyone know if they have bothered to talk with the public and/or the landowners that may be impacted by the whole thing?
If the proposed AltaLink line is creating as much controversy as it is, what makes them think that a rail line will be any better accepted?
Seems to me we always undertake "feasibility" studies and never bother to start the discussions with landowners etc. at the same time. What about any environmental impacts, loss of development potential etc.?
Might be a good idea for those who travel the roads frequently, but those who might be affected the most i.e. landowners who will have to abide by the lines going through their land are never really considered. Wouldn't it be wonderful if the discussions went on concurrently so that when the time came to move forward, it wouldn't be so much of a struggle?
Comment