CO2 levels too low?

[AlbertaFarmer5]

It’s a metaphor. A figure of speech. Are you still into literal interpretations of the bible? If you can’t seed do your own research on CO2 and temperature. But try to source your information from credible scientific organizations.

I just did a quick search and it seems to indicate that NOAA and NASA only claim to show the instrument record. Life on earth predates the instrument record by quite a lot actually. So if the entirety of your sources only deal with the instrument record that doesn't explain why you would be deluded into thinking these are dangerously high levels.

As for your reference to the Bible, I don't read fiction books, Let alone waste any time trying to interpret them. I thought you were trying to discuss scientific literature, why did you bring storybooks into it ?

[seldomseen]

To funny
Mention C02 and Chucky jumps to life!
Talk farming Yawn💤💤💤

[AlbertaFarmer5]

To funny
Mention C02 and Chucky jumps to life!
Talk farming Yawn💤💤💤

How true, he must have some sort of filters set up to notify him when his presence is required to straighten us all out.

However in this case I get the impression that it may have been the crayon comment that hit a little too close to Home that triggered him rather than the CO2

[chuckChuck]

It’s the flat earth club!

Don’t try to prove your theory with a homemade rocket! Or any wacky climate change denial science project ideas! LOL

Stay safe and happy seeding.

[FarmJunkie]

Good thing we listen to all the so called experts. With all their expert leadership look where it’s lead us in the Corona virus bullshit. No different than the climate change crap. Anything to stir up fear and division. If u can’t scare em it won’t sell. If they wanted to scare people explain to them the economic shit storm that’s gonna hit after this virus horseshit is done. Not that it wasn’t coming without the virus garbage but people are so dumb they have no clue that borrowing from tomorrow to pay for today eventually bites u in the ass. Part that pisses me off even more is the fact that some of us tried to run a fiscally responsible ship while others spent like drunken sailors and now this fiasco is gonna hurt all of us especially if u have equity. I’m sure our donkey in Ottawa will try and steal more of that from us as well.

[farmaholic]

CO2 levels too low?

Ok everyone take afew deep breaths
Take another one and count to ten....
Exhale...

Better now?

Everyone needs to start breathing more if you want to increase CO2 levels!

[AlbertaFarmer5]

CO2 levels too low?

Ok everyone take afew deep breaths
Take another one and count to ten....
Exhale...

Better now?

Everyone needs to start breathing more if you want to increase CO2 levels!

I blame the cursed grain farmers. They keep planting crops which keep enjoying the CO2 that me, my family and my livestock work so hard to produce. Maybe if you straight grain guys could take a few years off, we could make some real progress.

I can think of a few folks who are really worked up about CO2, for whom if they were to hold their breath long enough to have a measurable impact on CO2 levels would be doing a service to humanity.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

It’s the flat earth club!

Don’t try to prove your theory with a homemade rocket! Or any wacky climate change denial science project ideas! LOL

Stay safe and happy seeding.

SO predictable I could write the responses myself. Rather than fact check anything that might not confirm your bias, just resort to the old standby of flat earth club and insults. Thanks for being reliable.

[chuckChuck]

I only keep repeating myself because you and your club members keep repeating your bizarre unscientific theories and untruths.

Dangerously low CO2 levels is wacky idea. They were significantly lower in the mid 1800s and have been rising ever since. But don’t let scientific facts get in the way of your thinking!

If CO2 is dangerously low and cooling is occurs wouldn’t the glaciers in the Rockies be growing? They are still shrinking!

The Human caused climate change period of the last 170 years or so iS the period most relevant to the increase in CO2 levels and human impact.

All other eras prior to this period are irrelevant to measuring human impact.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I only keep repeating myself because you and your club members keep repeating your bizarre unscientific theories and untruths.

Dangerously low CO2 levels is wacky idea. They were significantly lower in the mid 1800s and have been rising ever since. But don’t let scientific facts get in the way of your thinking!

So there you have it folks. Any scientist who dares to point out the evidence of much higher CO2 levels in earths geological history is unscientific, speaking untruths, wacky, bizarre etc. Sounds like a good starting point to have an open rational scientific debate about the dangers of or unprecedented nature of our current dismal levels of CO2.

[AlbertaFarmer5]

I would say there isn't enough heavy breathing going on in your house.

Ache4acres hasn't yet responded to your suggestion. I assume that means that he is performing the experiment, and showing his true dedication to science, has had to repeat it over and over to get reliable repeatable results.

[chuckChuck]

If you are so worried about global cooling look up up what is the cause of the glacial periods. There are several factors. None of which is having a significant impact at the moment.

Human caused climate change period data is the most important because the periods prior to human influence had millions of years of other causes. The earth is a few billions of years old. Do you think the billions of years of the planets history is relative to the last 170?

Where do you think all the carbon from burning millions of barrels of oil and other fossil fuels is going? Is it all “just soot“ as you once said? LOL